Overview of Financial Viability Risk Assessment
Financial Viability Risk Assessment (FVRA) is tool often used when evaluating suppliers in public sector procurement exercises. It helps you assess potential risks associated with a supplier's financial health.
The FVRA tool is designed to provide a standardised approach to assessing financial viability. You can use it to gauge the financial stability of potential suppliers before entering into contracts.
When conducting an FVRA, you'll typically examine:
- Financial statements
- Credit ratings
- Cash flow projections
- Debt levels
- Profitability ratios
The assessment results are often categorised into risk levels, such as low, medium, or high. This helps you make informed decisions about supplier selection and risk mitigation strategies.
Government frameworks and Dynamic Purchasing Systems often require suppliers to complete an FVRA as part of the procurement process. This ensures that public sector organisations work with financially stable partners.
By using the FVRA, you can:
- Identify potential financial risks
- Compare suppliers objectively
- Develop appropriate risk mitigation plans
- Protect your organisation from financial instability
Remember, the FVRA is just one part of a comprehensive supplier assessment. It should be used alongside other evaluation criteria to make well-rounded decisions in your procurement process.
Understanding the FVRA Process
The Financial Viability Risk Assessment (FVRA) is a crucial component of the procurement process. It helps evaluate suppliers' financial stability and mitigate potential risks.
Stages of FVRA
The FVRA typically involves several key stages. First, you'll need to gather financial information from potential suppliers. This includes balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements.
Next, you'll analyse these documents using specific financial ratios and metrics. These may include liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, and solvency ratios.
After analysis, you'll assign risk ratings to each supplier. These ratings help determine the level of risk associated with contracting a particular supplier.
Finally, you'll prepare a report summarising your findings and recommendations. This report informs decision-makers about potential financial risks and helps guide procurement decisions.
Role of the Accountant
Accountants play a vital role in the FVRA process. They bring expertise in financial analysis and risk assessment, ensuring accurate evaluation of suppliers' financial health.
Your accountant will interpret financial statements, calculate key ratios, and identify potential red flags. They'll also help you understand the implications of these findings for your procurement decisions.
Moreover, accountants can assist in developing risk mitigation strategies. These might include requiring performance bonds or implementing more frequent financial checks for high-risk suppliers.
Compliance with Procurement Regulations
Conducting an FVRA helps ensure compliance with procurement regulations. Many government bodies require a thorough assessment of suppliers' financial viability before awarding contracts.
The UK Government's Sourcing Playbook provides guidance on conducting FVRAs. It emphasises the importance of proportionality in assessments, ensuring the level of scrutiny matches the contract's value and complexity.
You'll need to document your FVRA process carefully. This includes recording the methods used, data sources, and decision-making rationale. Proper documentation helps demonstrate compliance and transparency in your procurement process.
Understanding the FVRA Framework
The FVRA evaluates financial health using specific risk thresholds based on metrics outlined in the "Authority RAG Thresholds" tab of the assessment tool. These metrics determine whether a bidder's financial position is classified as:
- Green (Low Risk): Acceptable without further action.
- Amber (Medium Risk): Requires explanation and mitigation measures.
- Red (High Risk): Requires detailed justification and poses significant concerns.
Bidders classified as Amber or Red are not automatically disqualified but must provide robust mitigations for consideration.
Key Components of the FVRA
1. Preparation and Initial Review
Before completing a FVRA Tool, bidders should:
- Familiarise themselves with the "Bidder Instructions" tab within the tool, as well as the wider tender documents.
- Identify the correct organisation type (e.g., Private Limited Company, Not-for-Profit) from the dropdown in Row 39 (usually).
2. Selecting Relevant Financial Data
Bidders must provide the following:
- Published accounts for the last three financial years (Lead Bidder, Parent Company, and Ultimate Parent Company, if applicable).
- Certified translations of accounts if they are not in English.
- UK Sterling conversions if the financial figures are not expressed in GBP, using exchange rates as of the accounts' audit date.
3. Addressing RAG Classifications
It is important to review the specific requirements for each opportunity, however metrics assessed include:
- Net Asset Value: Must be positive to achieve Green status.
- Turnover Ratio: Calculated relative to project value, for example, requiring a ratio of 2x or less for Green.
- Operating Margin: A minimum of 3% for Green classification.
- Liquidity and Solvency Ratios (e.g., Acid Test): Demonstrating sound short-term financial health.
For any Amber or Red classifications:
- Provide detailed explanations in tabs 3.1 to 3.3 of the FVRA Tool.
- Outline specific mitigations, such as secured credit facilities or parent company guarantees, to address identified risks.
- Highlight your concerns to the contracting authority. Clearly highlight your specific circumstances and ask if this would create a PASS.
FVRA Submission Guidelines
1. Required Documentation
Submit the following in a single ZIP folder under Part 1.25 of the Selection Questionnaire:
- Completed Attachment 5a FVRA Tool.
- Published accounts (Lead Bidder, Parent, and Ultimate Parent where applicable).
- Statements addressing any significant changes in financial position since the most recent accounts.
2. Responding to Clarifications
If the CCS requests additional information or clarification, respond promptly through the eSourcing messaging system within the specified timeframe.
3. Post-Submission Requirements
Before awarding the framework:
- Notify CCS of any material changes to your financial position that may affect your EFS.
- Provide updated financial data if the last submitted accounts are over 12 months old.
Practical Advice for Success
1. Accuracy and Completeness
Ensure all financial data and supporting documentation are accurate and complete. Errors or omissions may result in exclusion from the competition.
2. Collaboration with Stakeholders
Coordinate with internal finance teams and external auditors to gather the necessary information. If bidding as a consortium, ensure all members comply with submission requirements.
3. Proactive Risk Management
For Amber or Red classifications:
- Provide comprehensive mitigations and evidence (e.g., letters of credit or insurance policies).
- Align your mitigations with the Sourcing Playbook to demonstrate awareness of government procurement priorities.
4. Clear Communication
When addressing financial challenges or risks, use precise and structured explanations. For example:
- Highlight measures already in place to mitigate risks.
- Demonstrate how your organisation remains financially robust despite isolated concerns.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Incomplete Submissions: Missing tabs, incorrect organisation type, or failure to upload all required documents can disqualify your bid.
- Unexplained Amber or Red Results: Always provide detailed mitigations for any risk classification.
- Late Responses to Clarifications: Monitor eSourcing communications diligently to avoid missing deadlines for additional information requests.
Prefer to discuss?
Contact us todayKey Financial Documents for Assessment
Financial viability risk assessments rely on crucial documents that provide insights into a company's financial health. These documents offer a comprehensive view of assets, liabilities, income, and financial history.
Interpreting the Balance Sheet
The balance sheet is a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It lists assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. You'll find current assets like cash and inventory, as well as long-term assets such as property and equipment.
Liabilities are divided into current (due within a year) and long-term. Pay close attention to the debt-to-equity ratio, which indicates the company's leverage.
A healthy balance sheet shows a good mix of assets and manageable liabilities. Look for trends over time to gauge financial stability.
Analysing the Income Statement
The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, reveals a company's financial performance over a specific period. It starts with revenue and deducts various expenses to arrive at net income.
Key elements to examine include:
- Gross profit margin
- Operating expenses
- Net profit margin
Exceptional and non-underlying items are not typically included in ratio calculations if the net total is positive. This ensures a more accurate representation of ongoing business performance.
Compare figures year-on-year to identify growth trends or potential issues.
Importance of Comprehensive Financial History
A thorough assessment requires examining financial data over multiple years. This historical perspective allows you to spot patterns and assess the company's ability to weather economic fluctuations.
Look for consistency in revenue growth and profit margins. Sudden changes may warrant further investigation. Pay attention to cash flow statements, which show how the company generates and uses cash.
For public sector contracts, organisations often use either a business credit check or the Financial Viability Risk Assessment (FVRA) tool. The FVRA is typically applied to companies with an annual turnover of £2.5m and above.
Assessing Suppliers' Financial Health
Evaluating suppliers' financial health is crucial for managing risk and ensuring stable business relationships. You should consider multiple factors when assessing a supplier's economic and financial standing, including their credit score, debt levels, and overall financial stability.
Factors Influencing Suppliers' Economic and Financial Standing
When assessing suppliers, you need to examine their liquidity, net worth, and ability to meet financial obligations. Key Supplier monitoring should cover not just contractual Financial Distress Events but take a broader view of a supplier's business health.
Look at financial ratios such as:
- Current ratio (current assets / current liabilities)
- Quick ratio (liquid assets / current liabilities)
- Debt-to-equity ratio
Pay attention to trends in these ratios over time. A declining trend may indicate potential financial distress.
For SMEs, consider their cash flow and working capital. Smaller suppliers may have less financial cushion, making them more vulnerable to market fluctuations.
Impact of Credit Scores and Debt Levels
Credit scores and debt levels play a significant role in assessing a supplier's financial health. A good credit score indicates reliability in meeting financial obligations. You should review suppliers' credit reports from reputable agencies.
High debt levels can be a red flag, especially if a supplier's debt-to-equity ratio is unfavourable. However, context is important. Some industries naturally carry more debt than others.
Consider these factors:
- Payment history
- Credit utilisation
- Length of credit history
- Types of credit used
Remember, financial standing should not be the sole criterion for supplier selection. It's part of a broader assessment that includes their ability to deliver products or services.
Speak to an expert!
Contact usTools and Models for FVRA
Financial Viability Risk Assessment (FVRA) relies on specialised tools and methodologies to evaluate supplier stability. These instruments help you analyse financial data and predict potential risks effectively.
Software Tools for Risk Assessment
The Financial Viability Risk Assessment tool is a crucial instrument for conducting FVRAs. This tool, adapted by Crown Commercial Service (CCS), is based on the Cabinet Office's FVRA Tool version 4.3.1. You'll find it particularly useful for assessing bids in government procurement processes.
When using the FVRA tool, you'll input financial data and the software will calculate key ratios and thresholds. These metrics help you gauge a supplier's financial health and risk level. The tool typically excludes exceptional and non-underlying items from ratio calculations when the net total is positive.
Applying Should Cost Modelling
Should Cost Modelling is a vital technique in your FVRA toolkit. This approach helps you estimate what a project or service should cost based on various factors and market data.
To apply Should Cost Modelling effectively:
- Gather detailed cost data from similar projects
- Analyse market trends and economic factors
- Consider supplier capabilities and efficiencies
- Factor in potential risks and contingencies
By using this model, you can set realistic cost expectations and identify potential discrepancies in supplier proposals. It's an essential part of best practice in procurement risk assessment.
Remember to regularly update your Should Cost Models to reflect current market conditions and emerging trends in your industry. This will ensure your FVRA remains accurate and relevant.
Financial Risk Considerations for SMEs
Financial risk assessment for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) involves unique challenges and considerations. Evaluating financial capacity and developing a robust business plan are crucial for SMEs to manage their risks effectively.
Challenges for Small and Medium Enterprises
SMEs face distinct financial risks due to their size and limited resources. Cash flow management is often a significant challenge, as late payments or unexpected expenses can quickly impact your financial stability. You may also struggle with access to credit, making it difficult to fund growth or weather economic downturns.
Market volatility can disproportionately affect your business, as you may lack the diversification of larger companies. Additionally, you might find it challenging to attract and retain skilled financial personnel, potentially leading to gaps in financial expertise and planning.
To mitigate these risks, you should focus on maintaining accurate financial records and developing contingency plans. Consider seeking external financial advice or partnering with other SMEs to share resources and knowledge.
Evaluating Risk in Smaller Businesses
Assessing financial risk in SMEs requires a tailored approach. Traditional financial metrics may not always provide a complete picture of your business's financial health.
You should evaluate:
- Working capital ratios
- Cash conversion cycle
- Customer concentration
- Supplier dependencies
It's crucial to regularly review your business plan and financial projections. This helps you identify potential risks and adjust your strategies accordingly. Consider using financial modelling tools to scenario plan for different market conditions.
Engage with stakeholders, including banks and investors, to understand their risk assessment criteria. This can help you prepare for financial viability assessments when seeking funding or bidding for contracts.
Remember, your personal financial situation as a business owner may also impact your company's risk profile. Ensure you have clear boundaries between personal and business finances.
Importance of Financial Information for Procurement
Financial information plays a crucial role in procurement processes, helping organisations assess supplier viability and mitigate risks. It provides valuable insights into a supplier's financial health and stability.
Applying EFS Assessment in Procurement
When evaluating potential suppliers, you should consider their Economic and Financial Standing (EFS). This assessment helps you gauge a supplier's financial stability and capacity to deliver goods or services.
Financial standing is a key component of the overall selection criteria. It's important to note that financial standing alone may not fully reflect a provider's ability to deliver.
To conduct an EFS assessment:
- Review financial statements
- Analyse key financial ratios
- Assess credit ratings
- Evaluate cash flow projections
Only experienced staff should perform these assessments. You may need to consult specialist in-house or external expertise for complex evaluations.
Framework Agreements and Financial Viability
For framework agreements, financial viability is a critical factor. Suppliers often need to complete a Financial Viability Risk Assessment (FVRA) tool as part of the procurement process.
The FVRA tool helps you:
- Assess suppliers' financial health
- Identify potential risks
- Ensure suppliers can meet contractual obligations
When evaluating FVRAs, pay attention to:
- Financial ratios
- Profit and loss statements
- Balance sheets
- Cash flow forecasts
FVRA for Public Services and Contracting Authorities
Financial Viability Risk Assessments play a crucial role in public sector procurement and contracting. They help ensure financial stability and mitigate risks when engaging suppliers for government projects and services.
Governance and Regulation Compliance
Public services and contracting authorities must adhere to strict governance guidelines when conducting FVRAs. The Public Contract Regulations 2015 permit contracting authorities to require minimum annual turnover up to twice the estimated contract value. You will also need to ensure you are updated with the Procurement Act and its implications.
You should consider the following key aspects:
• Regulatory framework compliance
• Transparency in assessment criteria
• Fair and equal treatment of suppliers
• Documentation of FVRA processes
It's essential to align your FVRA practices with government guidance. The Cabinet Office's FVRA Tool provides a standardised approach for financial assessments.
Considerations for Public Sector Organisations
When conducting FVRAs, you must take into account the unique aspects of public sector procurement. This includes assessing the financial stability of suppliers, their parent companies, and ultimate parent companies.
Key considerations:
- Supplier size and structure
- Contract value and duration
- Critical service delivery risks
- Supplier market conditions
Use the FVRA tool to calculate financial ratios automatically. This helps generate risk bands for each bidder, subject to your override as the contracting authority.
Remember to reassess suppliers periodically, especially for long-term contracts or Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS). This ensures ongoing financial viability throughout the contract lifecycle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Financial Viability Risk Assessments (FVRAs) involve specific components, tools, criteria, and processes. Understanding these elements and their application is crucial for effective financial risk management.
What components are crucial in a financial viability risk assessment template?
A comprehensive FVRA template typically includes financial ratios, profit and loss statements, and balance sheet information. It should also incorporate sections for cash flow analysis and future financial projections.
Key components often include liquidity ratios, solvency measures, and profitability indicators. These help assess a company's short-term and long-term financial health.
Which tools are recommended for conducting a Financial Viability Risk Assessment?
The Cabinet Office's Financial Viability Risk Assessment Tool (version 4.3.1) is widely used in the UK public sector. This tool has been adapted by various organisations for specific needs.
For G-Cloud procurements, for example, the Crown Commercial Service provides a tailored FVRA tool. It's essential to use the most up-to-date version of these tools for accurate assessments.
What criteria are included when assessing an entity's financial viability?
Key criteria often include profitability, liquidity, and solvency ratios. These help evaluate a company's ability to meet its financial obligations.
Other important factors are cash flow stability, debt levels, and revenue trends. Exceptional and non-underlying items may be excluded from ratio calculations in some cases.
What should suppliers consider about insolvency risks and phoenix companies in public procurement?
Suppliers should maintain transparency and demonstrate financial stability by providing up-to-date accounts and clear explanations of any business changes. If your company has restructured, ensure lawful separation from previous entities to avoid associations with phoenix companies. Proactive communication with buyers about changes and mitigating risks can build trust and maintain your credibility in public procurement.
What are the steps involved in performing a financial risk assessment?
The process typically begins with gathering financial data from the entity being assessed. This includes recent financial statements and projections.
Next, you'll input this data into the chosen FVRA tool. The tool will calculate various financial ratios and indicators.
You'll then analyse these results against predetermined benchmarks or industry standards. This helps identify areas of strength or potential concern in the entity's financial position.
How frequently should a Financial Viability Risk Assessment be conducted?
For ongoing contracts or partnerships, it's advisable to conduct FVRAs annually. This allows you to track changes in financial health over time.
For new contract bids, FVRAs are typically required as part of the initial assessment process. Some procurements may require more frequent assessments for high-value or high-risk contracts.
What are the potential outcomes of a Financial Viability Risk Assessment?
Outcomes can range from a low-risk rating, indicating strong financial health, to a high-risk rating suggesting significant financial concerns.
For public sector procurements, failing an FVRA may result in exclusion from the bidding process. In ongoing relationships, a poor FVRA outcome might trigger a need for additional financial guarantees or closer monitoring.
